The 'too much water' problem — sea level rise, storm surge, and extreme precipitation — is often more immediately destructive than scarcity because it is acute, infrastructure-damaging, and system-wide. Excess water events rapidly overwhelm design thresholds, causing floods, slope failures, and cascading disruption across transport, utilities, and urban systems. These failures are sudden, visible, and increasingly translate into insurable and investable risk.
Water scarcity is a major global challenge, but it is harder to invest in at scale. Solutions like desalination, reuse, atmospheric water generation (AWG), and distribution sit within complex regulatory, political, and often human-rights constrained environments, which slows deployment and limits scalability. The technologies often work, and the founders behind them are usually passionate — but the addressable market is frequently captured by public policy, subsidized infrastructure, or incumbent industrial players, not by venture-shaped software economics.
As a result, Mazarine Climate is generally not interested in scarcity-focused solutions unless they are directly tied to power generation — hydro and thermoelectric — where reliability directly drives infrastructure demand and a compelled buyer already exists. Water quality and excess-water risk otherwise tend to offer clearer commercial pathways. This framing underpins our thesis and prioritization.
Scarcity matters, and we tip our hat to everyone working on it. But we have found that many investors conflate importance with investability. 'Water is life' is true — and it is also a poor reason to write a venture check. That is why our primary focus stays on the 'too much water' headache: it is where the risk is most immediately priced, the buyers are most compelled, and the venture-shaped returns are most achievable.